tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18806762.post2634335354856420798..comments2023-09-28T06:47:43.209-04:00Comments on The Surly Poker Gnome: More on Hand CombosGnomehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06181215527323378978noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18806762.post-16423239767892214392007-09-07T00:34:00.000-04:002007-09-07T00:34:00.000-04:00When you say:.27 * -$1,000 = -$-270.73 * $580 ($14...When you say:<BR/>.27 * -$1,000 = -$-270<BR/>.73 * $580 ($140+$140+$300)= $423.40<BR/>EV = $153.40<BR/><BR/>You're ignoring the fact that his JJ is going to suck out and win roughly 8% of the time or so. So it's more like:<BR/><BR/>.25 * -$1,000 = -$250<BR/>.02 * $1000 = +$20<BR/>.73 * $580 ($140+$140+$300)= $423.40<BR/>EV = $193.40<BR/><BR/>Which would put the end results of this play as having a +EV.dshultzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13715769376785027002noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18806762.post-64635596516651871422007-09-06T09:58:00.000-04:002007-09-06T09:58:00.000-04:00I'd be very weary of calling a reraise with JJ in ...I'd be very weary of calling a reraise with JJ in the BB. Having said that, if it's a 6 max table, that would be different. But in a full ring game, unless the I know that someone reraises light, it would be hard to call a reraise because basically, IMO, JJ would be no different than any pocket pair below QQ. Basically, if I don't hit a set, I'm not gonna like where I stand. Does that make me too tight?Alan aka RecessRampagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00544791207717813141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18806762.post-12563052605249576222007-09-06T09:32:00.000-04:002007-09-06T09:32:00.000-04:00This is a good analysis and I'm relieved that what...This is a good analysis and I'm relieved that what to me is a donk move isn't overly profitable.kurokittyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00684922671174548776noreply@blogger.com